Very important issue - do not sign AVAAZ (or Change.org) petitions.
These organizations are everything but grassroot but tools for the elites.
It is also hard to unsubscribe from AVAAZ and so your voice is easily misused, creating a false image of the con.
Why - for instance would the right hand of Rottenschild - George Soros, the $$atan (so-to-say) himself and WallStreet/City Of London locust, kingpin, capo di capi-banxter ask to sign a petition to arrest banxters past LIBOR scandal ???)
Thank you very much Parsifal~
SiNeh~
As a reminder for Peace Acticists - do not sign AVAAZ petitions !
TOP IMAGE: AVAAZ calling for a No-Fly-Zone over Libya (a camouflaged - but direct declaration of war, the warmongers could never proclaim unvarnished)
AVAAZ - the controlled 'opposition' - support by deceit.
AVAAZ was created by (among others) Ricken Patel, who is, according to French Wikipedia, a former consultant for the International Crisis Group, UN, Rockefeller Fundation, Havard University, Gates Fundation, CARE International, Soros Network...
They regularly tackled subjects like 'global climate change', or (last months) war in Syria, with a pure MSM point of view... - Parsifal
the articles (all excerpts)
- AVAAZ - Mission Creep To Creepy.
Never thought I would become anti AVAAZ.
The concept seemed so great.
To enable the voices of thousands, millions of people around the world to be heard.
Sometimes by the right people, but sometimes simply by others.
A recent article in the Guardian (see here) questioning the wisdom of AVAAZ in calling for a No Fly Zone, generated a response by many (for and against) but also Ben Wikler, the AVAAZ Campaign director.
His comments can be found in the comments section, but basically his comment (through my interpretation) goes like this…
1. AVAAZ has decided on regime change, and has agents working on the ground with the rebels.
2. AVAAZ now requires NATO/US/UN to engage militarily to support our program of regime change.
3. AVAAZ uses crowd sourcing to solicit large numbers to back it, and funds for its programs.
As already said, (apart from 3.) this is exactly the methods used/promoted by the CIA and the NeoCons over the last few decades.
If the CIA were doing this, would huge numbers support it.
Of course not.
But AVAAZ gets support through deceit.
I also was seduced by it early on.
The deceit is that people believe it is a civilian action group, like protesters.
But this is a direct campaigning for military attacks on a foreign government.
Yes.
...
I have already spoken of the difficulty I have with this organization. Currently they have over 7 million people from all over the world who have registered themselves, email, name, location and their political beliefs with the US government.
I can’t understand that being the smartest thing in the world (I have, because I was one of those on a previous campaign.
(Can’t delete now).
AVAAZ is acting as a organisation for the promotion of US Hegemony through covert Soft Power manipulation.
Strong statement, but difficult to dismiss.
UPDATE: 29/05/2012 – It seems as though Jillian Cork from the EFF also has her doubts on the organisation and how they run politically (and incorrectly and damagingly)
source:
http://www.socialtrap.org/2011/03/avaaz-mission-creep-to-creepy/
- AVAAZ's role in Syria:
Around 8 a.m. on February 22, Syrian security forces attempting to prop up the Bashar al Assad regime shelled a makeshift media center in the Baba Amr neighborhood of Homs, killing the American war reporter Marie Colvin and the French photographer Remi Ochlik.
Four other journalists who survived the blast, including Colvin’s Irish photographer, Paul Conroy, (note by Parsifal: P. Conroy, is a MI6 operative) and French Le Figaro journalist Edith Bouvier, were transported to a nearby hospital and treated for serious shrapnel wounds.
Bouvier’s colleague, the French photographer William Daniels, accompanied them, while Spanish El Mundo reporter Javier Espinosa stayed behind to report near the now-decimated center.
For almost a week, the surviving journalists remained trapped in Homs.
On the morning of February 28, the activist organization Avaaz reported that it had coordinated Conroy’s escape to Lebanon and that 13 activists within its network had been killed in the effort. “This operation was carried by Syrians with the help of Avaaz,” read the press release. “No other agency was involved.” By the end of the day, Avaaz founder Ricken Patel had been interviewed on CNN and the BBC, and The Guardian had published a short profile titled, “The activist organisation behind Paul Conroy’s rescue in Syria.” Admiring profiles in Time and on NPR soon followed.
http://jilliancyork.com/2012/05/29/on-avaaz/
- Avaaz is a lobbying organization
The first is this: They are not a 501(c)(3) (non-profit) organization, rather, they are a 501(c)(4), the classification of organization that can lobby, engage in political campaigns, and don't have to name their major donors.
To put this in perspective, the 501(c)(4) designation applies to PACs, leading Stephen Colbert to label 501(c)(4)s “spooky PACs.”
http://jilliancyork.com/2012/05/29/on-avaaz/
related:
Experiment - Derail Soros Anti-Syria Consensus Generator
http://www.project.nsearch.com/profiles/blogs/experiment-derail-sor...
more of AVAAZ Syria defamation (pro NWO) campaigns:
EU: End the terror in Syria
http://www.avaaz.org/en/syria_end_the_terror/
India and US - Stop Syria's death dealer
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/us_and_india_stop_syrias_merchants_of_d...
Syria: stand with the protesters
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/syria_stand_with_the_protesters/
The only way to defeat Assad
http://www.avaaz.org/en/syria_unite_the_opposition/?vc
Image source:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/10/internet-activists-libya-no-fly-zone
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment